Wank or No Wank, the week ahead.
Oct. 30th, 2006 05:56 pmGot the calender,
adoralyna. Thank you :)
Let's play some Wank or No Wank.*
* as in Deal or No Deal, only you play with less money and more batshit.
Incest is rape! says poster, and goes on about the duty of fanfic. People agree. People disagree. Wank or No Wank?
Doctor Who fandom gets RPF and RPF speculation. People are none too impressed. Really not impressed. Wank or No Wank? (And what's with these new pink icons of potentially insulting nature? I've been noticing them for a little while now. I think I have Issues with Pink, really. Too much of that colour and I tend to want to stab sharp objects into my eyes.)
Also, RPF or no RPF?
Plans for the week:
- Finish ficathon pinch-hit.
- Finish Catherine/Grissom fic to be contrary.
- Ship the ready Christmas packages to
adoralyna,
saxihighlandck,
myshka23,
jenbachand and
falena84, who were all good and have sent addresses already. (Yes,
munchkin62, I got yours too, but since you wanted something from Amazon, it will wait a little while longer.) If you are on my gift exchange list, e-mail me your addy or leave a link to your Amazon giftlist already. Cards are not such a rush, but feel free to send your addy for that too.
- Donate blood.
- Decide whether or not to go see Vålerenga - Tromsø in Oslo. Last match of the season, heyho.
- Get out winter clothes, as first snow is drawing near.
- Not moan about work more than once a day.
Now to see how many I manage. I think I'll give myself a little reward for each. Mmm, motivation.
Let's play some Wank or No Wank.*
* as in Deal or No Deal, only you play with less money and more batshit.
Incest is rape! says poster, and goes on about the duty of fanfic. People agree. People disagree. Wank or No Wank?
Doctor Who fandom gets RPF and RPF speculation. People are none too impressed. Really not impressed. Wank or No Wank? (And what's with these new pink icons of potentially insulting nature? I've been noticing them for a little while now. I think I have Issues with Pink, really. Too much of that colour and I tend to want to stab sharp objects into my eyes.)
Also, RPF or no RPF?
Plans for the week:
- Finish ficathon pinch-hit.
- Finish Catherine/Grissom fic to be contrary.
- Ship the ready Christmas packages to
- Donate blood.
- Decide whether or not to go see Vålerenga - Tromsø in Oslo. Last match of the season, heyho.
- Get out winter clothes, as first snow is drawing near.
- Not moan about work more than once a day.
Now to see how many I manage. I think I'll give myself a little reward for each. Mmm, motivation.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 05:12 pm (UTC)And RPF...I've said it before and I shall say it again...NO! WRONG!!! CREEEEEEEEPY! Let the actors have lives, people!
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 05:22 pm (UTC)NaNo is scary from all looks of it. But good luck!
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 07:38 pm (UTC)Yep! Got it from the splendidly naughty The Rent A Jedi universe fics *many* years ago.
And thanks for the good wishes for Nano....I shall keep everyone posted, never fear ;-P
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 05:23 pm (UTC)Fiction. Real life. Learn to cherish the difference.
If the actors are friends, that is nice for them, because it makes for a happy set.
The actors do not have to be lovers in order for the characters to be lovers. In fact, if the actors are lovers, it can lead to the Set From Hell should they break up. See: Tom Baker/Lalla Ward's 16-month marriage.
David Tennant is not The Doctor. Billie Piper is not Rose Tyler. And neither of them is shagging me, or you. Unless you are Sophia Myles or Amadu Sowe, in which case, my God, are you insane? Run away from the Internet!
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 06:23 pm (UTC)...I'm sure that won't happen to David and Sophia.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 05:38 pm (UTC)The thing is, with something like Top Gear, the real people are all there is. I loved the relationship between the three of them, and I desperately wanted to write about the three of them interacting because it looked like so much fun, and RPF was the only way I could do that.
And so now I can understand why people are led to write RPF: it's essentially for the same reasons people write ordinary fanfiction. They see characters and relationships that intrigue them and that they want to explore; the only difference is that these 'characters' happen to be real.
I still find real-person deathfic horrendously creepy, and I can't read heavy angst or fics that outright deal with infidelity to or by their real-life partners either. (Also, I don't entirely understand actorslash, because I always find myself wondering 'how can they know the personalities of the actors behind the characters well enough to feel that need to explore their relationships?'. I completely understand why a person would be compelled to write fiction about real people from programmes about those people as themselves, though.)
Oh, dear, I'm rambling. And this may well not be coherent in the slightest. Er, I think that my point is 'RPF WRITERS ARE NOT INSANE. WELL, NOT ALL OF US. ER, MAYBE.'
To get off the subject for a moment: that 'incest=rape' thing is so going to be wank, if it isn't already.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 05:51 pm (UTC)And admittedly also icked when it involves minors. Just... No.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 06:19 pm (UTC)I read that and thought "Wow, she's hardcore" and then realised you meant ship not ship. *facepalm*
And what's with these new pink icons of potentially insulting nature? I've been noticing them for a little while now. I think I have Issues with Pink, really.
It's why this one be pinkish. Cos it seemed like the colour to be and I hope this one is demented enough not to insult... I don't know, anti-slash Romanashippers? Anti-het Jackshippers?
Also, RPF or no RPF?
Only when served on a bed of crack and garnished with the barest hint of intertextuality.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 06:40 pm (UTC)I can survive one pink icon. Just don't hit me with a flood. I may go blind and that might make you sad.
Only when served on a bed of crack and garnished with the barest hint of intertextuality.
Bad puns for dessert?
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 06:46 pm (UTC)I don't know. But now I wonder about "international shipping" and whether it involves people with a China/Sweden OTP.
I can survive one pink icon. Just don't hit me with a flood. I may go blind and that might make you sad.
Only when served on a bed of crack and garnished with the barest hint of intertextuality.
Bad puns for dessert?
I HIT POST TOO SOON
Date: 2006-10-30 06:48 pm (UTC)I know where the came from, at least I think I do. I do not know why they are pink other than that it is a pretty colour.
Bad puns for dessert?
Hell yes.
I SUCK AT HTML
Date: 2006-10-30 06:57 pm (UTC)Bitch, please. Sweden/Finland OTP. Theirloveissocomplicatedandborderissue. China's away loving on Taiwan, but it is unrequited, so North Korea will have to be the rebound land.
I know where the came from, at least I think I do. I do not know why they are pink other than that it is a pretty colour.
Pink in excess is foul. And yes, I have a feeling where some of them come from. Almost makes me want to get blue icons with Statements on. Because blue is the colour of the TARDIS and the TARDIS is bestest.
I'm having muffins for dessert myself.
Re: I SUCK AT HTML
Date: 2006-10-30 07:27 pm (UTC)Doctor/Jamie is tartan. Doctor/Rose... actually pink seems to work cos of her name is Rose. Doctor/Romana is black like DEATH and DESPAIR and WAR. Or pale blue. Doctor/Martha is blue and/or red. Doctor/Jack is a RAINBOW OF POLYSEXUAL LOVE. Doctor/Sarah is auburn.
...stop me, pls.
Re: I SUCK AT HTML
Date: 2006-10-30 10:27 pm (UTC)More colourcodes and you sound like the Tinhats.
Re: I SUCK AT HTML
Date: 2006-10-30 10:34 pm (UTC)Re: I SUCK AT HTML
Date: 2006-10-31 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 06:28 pm (UTC)And yes, I think that Sam/Dean is super hot, but that doesn't mean I would condone incest in real life. I get kind of ticked off when someone implies that shipping them has irreversably messed up my morals.
(I did wonder when the 'OMG Sam/Dean is WRONG' wank would show up. And here it is.)
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 06:30 pm (UTC)Generally, RPF's a no-no for me. It gets way to close to craziness.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 06:46 pm (UTC)But fiction is fiction, and real life is real life. There is a difference, even if they can both influence each other.
Billie does not fancy David Tennant.
I would not blame her if she did, since he's hot. But really, you can be attracted to people and still don't want to date them. And I rather do trust that people will be with who they want to be, which in Billie's case seems to be her current boyfriend.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 09:08 pm (UTC)This is why I stick to shipping fictional characters (Apart from Jensen/Jared, which is totally for fun. Plus, they joke about it themselves, so I figure they can take it).
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 10:25 pm (UTC)Wank or No Wank's no fun - it just leaves you slightly uncomfortable and without the £250,000 top prize. On the plus side it doesn't have Noel Edmonds so you could be on to a winner.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 11:51 pm (UTC)I am currently trying to guess how long it takes before I give up and get an oppossing icon just because I am in a bitchy mood.
And egads, Tinhats are not wanted in this fandom. Particularly if they are squeeing over the death of RL girlfriends.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-30 11:59 pm (UTC)Incest post: Wankity wank wank wank.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-31 12:50 am (UTC)I mean, isn't killing fundamentally wrong?...And if so, shouldn't I be disturbed that I find his vigilantism so intriguingly satisfying?...
ABS;)
no subject
Date: 2006-10-31 12:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-01 09:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 01:15 am (UTC)I'll be doing a holiday card post of my own, but I just realized that I did not have your mailing address.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-14 05:37 pm (UTC)