Fandom notes, with some bonus WTF
Jun. 22nd, 2007 01:30 pm*waves to new people on the flist*
Say what now?
So let me get this straight - in a rape trial, the word 'rape' has been banned from the proceedings?
...
Words fail me. Rage, on the other hand, is passing with flying colours.
Meanwhile, I went and got a permanent account - oh, and thanks for the paid time you transferred,
pocky_muncher. I hope you don't mind it's been transferred on - and decided to have the 25$ donated to RAINN. Now I gotta figure out what icons to fill my remaining spaces with. Mmm, icons. Maybe I should bribe someone to make me special ones again. (Should totally get one with Martha and Rose and "likes both", if such a thing is out there.)
Doctor Who fandom is so (mostly) calm at the moment I except much wankery any day now. Probably any day tomorrow. I shall stock the wankshelter bar and polish my modax.
And maybe it'll even be about this comm.
Speaking of comms, what's your taken on borrowing ideas from other comms? Is credit common courtesy, or is everything considered public domain or what?
In other fandom notes:
- LJ comments being silly again. If I haven't replied to something, I probably haven't gotten the alert. Sorry!
- The CSI season 8 speculation page gives me light headaches. Oi.
- Sometimes I wonder if "I love fans, it's fandom I can't stand" should be a saying. Or perhaps the opposite is also true.
- People wank about a wank report on gay marriage wank. Oi.
- Things You Never Really Thought You'd Find For Sale, Part CMXIIV:
*Published* Mary Sue/Prince William fanfic. Whaaaa...?
- Jack/Ten/Martha is not exciting me. Oh, sad lack of Jack love, it's all your fault. Ten/Martha is all good, though. So is still Doctor/Rose.And Barbara/Ian.
- Uh oh, my name mentioned in a piece pretty much defending Cassie Claire. Should I flee for the hills?
Finally, trying summon some desire to write again - so if you're feeling so kind, hit me with lines you'd love to see in a fanfic. Maybe my brain will ping.
Wheeeee weekend soon.

Say what now?
So let me get this straight - in a rape trial, the word 'rape' has been banned from the proceedings?
...
Words fail me. Rage, on the other hand, is passing with flying colours.
Meanwhile, I went and got a permanent account - oh, and thanks for the paid time you transferred,
Doctor Who fandom is so (mostly) calm at the moment I except much wankery any day now. Probably any day tomorrow. I shall stock the wankshelter bar and polish my modax.
And maybe it'll even be about this comm.
Speaking of comms, what's your taken on borrowing ideas from other comms? Is credit common courtesy, or is everything considered public domain or what?
In other fandom notes:
- LJ comments being silly again. If I haven't replied to something, I probably haven't gotten the alert. Sorry!
- The CSI season 8 speculation page gives me light headaches. Oi.
- Sometimes I wonder if "I love fans, it's fandom I can't stand" should be a saying. Or perhaps the opposite is also true.
- People wank about a wank report on gay marriage wank. Oi.
- Things You Never Really Thought You'd Find For Sale, Part CMXIIV:
*Published* Mary Sue/Prince William fanfic. Whaaaa...?
- Jack/Ten/Martha is not exciting me. Oh, sad lack of Jack love, it's all your fault. Ten/Martha is all good, though. So is still Doctor/Rose.
- Uh oh, my name mentioned in a piece pretty much defending Cassie Claire. Should I flee for the hills?
Finally, trying summon some desire to write again - so if you're feeling so kind, hit me with lines you'd love to see in a fanfic. Maybe my brain will ping.
Wheeeee weekend soon.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 11:59 am (UTC)...Just curious, but what are your thoughts on Ten/[spoilery character]? Or just a certain character in question.
No particular reason, I'm just curious.
Also, though certain Doctor Who comms look fun, it's the sort of fun that looks like trouble. Which, speaking of, apparently the GAFF forums are back. Finally.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 12:10 pm (UTC)Oh yeah, bound to be trouble sooner or later on that one, I think. If nothing else, mocking fanfic tends to lead to an irate author finding out sooner or later. But we'll see, I guess.
Yeah, GAFF be back. I'm waiting slightly with registering, though. GAFF was a bit drained of fun for a while there.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 12:23 pm (UTC)...And yet I still quite like Remus/Tonks. Weird.
I registered, made a couple of comments, has lulz at some fic. But if it gets ridiculous again, I can take off - no-one's forcing me to visit. I just miss the fun mockery.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 12:55 pm (UTC)I don't mind slash, really, it's just not what I mostly seek out to read or write. I've read some good Aziraphale/Crowley and read way too much LotR slash. It's just not my preference. But well-written will always rule the day, no matter what genre.
Has Hellfire come back as well?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 01:04 pm (UTC)It's really odd, because all my RL geeky friends turn to me when they hear something about slash. But, though I like certain slash pairings, I still tend to default to het (or gen. But when I want porn, I tend to look for het first)
I am afraid to find out.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 01:15 pm (UTC)Porn, where is porn?I think it's a bit common to default to your own sexuality, so to speak.
If she gets to enlightening us about how hateful Islam is again while praising incest, I may lose the last part of my brain.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 12:10 pm (UTC)The rape trial however, not so funny though. Thats a whole lot of different kind of stupid that just makes me want to hit something.
And a Mary Sue/Prince William book?? WTF?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 12:15 pm (UTC)Blah.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 12:18 pm (UTC)I'm glad to know I'm not the only one. I've gotten some comments over a day after they were posted.
Jack/Ten/Martha is not exciting me.
Out of curiosity, what about Jack/Martha?
Thank for the links to stuff. Now I have more things that I can use as an excuse to procrastinate.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 12:40 pm (UTC)Jack/Martha doesn't interest me as Jack doesn't, basically.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 12:27 pm (UTC)Re: Who Fandom. This clearly is the calm before the storm. Also, I think I enjoyed more Barrowman in the Confidential than Jack in Utopia. I am le weird.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 12:48 pm (UTC)I le weird with you - I kinda like JB a bit more than Jack as well.
Oh, and got your package and train ticket. I'll e-mail you.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-23 09:36 am (UTC)It got there in barely four days?!? Italian post did me proud. :P
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 12:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 12:33 pm (UTC)prince william fantasy book? whaaaat?
have a good one :o)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 12:51 pm (UTC)*giant eyeroll*
It will soon be a very good one when weekend starts!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 04:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-23 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 12:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 01:26 pm (UTC)Words are important. Really, really important. If the word 'rape' can't be used, then the connotations…
It really is a bit far.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 01:42 pm (UTC)I have a feeling the DW fandom will be stirred up plently with the last two episodes. How much do you want to bet Rose will be mentioned in the next episode?
Um... I have a kind of a running gag with friends where the phrase 'reverse the polarity' means sex or even better, orgasm. Maybe you could work that into a sex fic?
Apparently Mr Saxon has a wife. Can you imagine being married to the Master?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 03:42 pm (UTC)Ya. I show a finger heartily in their direction.
I have a kind of a running gag with friends where the phrase 'reverse the polarity' means sex or even better, orgasm. Maybe you could work that into a sex fic?
Uh oh, that kind of gave me a vague idea for a fic. Hmm. *ponders* Yeee-esss, that might work.
Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 03:43 pm (UTC)I have a feeling that might not have been the only thing the book got wrong.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 02:20 pm (UTC)The reasoning being that the
terminal waste of existencerapist has to restrain the victim and that rape=tortureWhich might avoid that this WTF be used as a precedent.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 03:38 pm (UTC)Please don't cencor yourself, particulary on my account. I link to things and debates I find interesting in my LJ all the time, yours was just another example.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 03:45 pm (UTC)My first instinct was to eyes-only the post... but that would be cowardly. XD
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 03:53 pm (UTC)I have actually read Pawn to Queen. I rather liked it a lot to start with, but the later chapters rather lost my interest, I'm afraid. As I recall, it was THE Snape/Hermoine fic at the time. (I was never that into Snape-centric, but my BFF
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 04:12 pm (UTC)That was my whole point. You just made it in 2 sentences. *laughs at self* Unfortunately the post meandered into the wrong territory and wank ensued.
Thank you for being so polite. I appreciate it.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 09:25 pm (UTC)But hey, you locked it down before it got really wanky, so it's not like you'll wake up tomorrow on f_w. (I've done that - well, I was just mentioned, really, so wasn't too bad, but it's still a bit of a "oh deeeeeear" experience.)
All the more reason to drink more ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-23 12:00 am (UTC)Yeah... I wasn't quite ready for the big kids pool here on LJ. I honestly didn't think anyone would *read* it, let alone get pointed to on metafandom, etc. I'm not saying this is large on the drama scale for anyone but me... but as someone who has met F2F 3/4 of the people of who have her friended... it was a little frightening. LOL.
*raises glass in a toast*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-23 10:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 08:55 pm (UTC)That is the only option.
That gay marriage wank with too many wanks has given me a headache.
♥
no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-22 11:27 pm (UTC)As for a line that might work in a fanfic somewhere, somehow:
"Well you didn't get that at RadioShack did you?"
no subject
Date: 2007-06-23 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-23 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 03:53 am (UTC)...what the??!
it's sad what our world has come to.
Completely OT
Date: 2007-06-27 05:25 pm (UTC)Re: Completely OT
Date: 2007-06-28 07:27 am (UTC)I appreciate you checking with me and I will run this by the other mods, but could you take T&C business to Page-A-Mod for the future? There all three mods will see it, you're more likely to get a prompt response and we like to have a place to track all the various mod issues should something ever resurface.
Re: Completely OT
Date: 2007-06-28 11:09 am (UTC)(Mind you, I'm hoping not to have too many moments of "I think this is on topic, but I don't want y'all thinking I'm wanking your comm.")