FF.net does it again
Apr. 27th, 2005 10:04 pmApril 27th, 2005 In addition, FanFiction.Net would like to address a growing problem. For whatever reason, some writers feel it's okay to copy-n-paste musical lyrics they have not
written into their fiction. If you did not write it, do not post it. This has always been our policy. Please remove these entries immediately to avoid account closure.
Øy, the hell?
You know, I've just about had it with ff.net... They yank OFUM2, a whole bunch of fics of my friends and now I can't quote lyrics in my chapters? Joy oh joy.
written into their fiction. If you did not write it, do not post it. This has always been our policy. Please remove these entries immediately to avoid account closure.
Øy, the hell?
You know, I've just about had it with ff.net... They yank OFUM2, a whole bunch of fics of my friends and now I can't quote lyrics in my chapters? Joy oh joy.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 01:14 pm (UTC)From reading about fair use, I believe you're legally allowed to use up to 10% of a song for it to be okay, but more than that is illegal. Legally speaking you're safe with a couple of lines but more than that could be a problem.
It's possible that Xing has had no choice but to implement these changes. Considering how many users at FF.net just paste an entire song with one or two lines of story, I wouldn't be surprised if the RIAA's lawyers and minions aren't threatening him with legal action if he doesn't make a genuine effort to clean things up. By hosting stories that violate the law, he's risking a lawsuit and hefty fine and maybe jail time himself.
So I don't think you can blame Xing for this one - complain to the RIAA.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 01:18 pm (UTC)Fanfiction is a murky legal area anyway.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 02:21 pm (UTC)Of course, I also think there should be a way to reject stories like "Hermione is raped by Draco but they realize it was just his expression of twu wuv!!!11one!" because the writer is a twit, but I don't see any signs of a twit filter being implemented :-)
But in all seriousness, I do think he needs a cannon because, even with a cannon, most of the users just don't pay any attention. My personal opinion is he should take off and nuke it from orbit, just to be sure, and eliminate the problem at its root. He needs to figure out a way to make his target demographic older and more mature, and end the unscreened submission policy.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 02:24 pm (UTC)Ooh, can I
no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 02:57 pm (UTC)Horribly mixed metaphors
Date: 2005-04-27 08:23 pm (UTC)My guess is that there will be a lot of slash-and-burn (if you'll excuse the term) with the dial turned up to eleven. If such radical surgery doesn't kill FF outright, there may be some relaxing of these rather crude rules at a future date.
Delicacy probably requires more resources than Xing has to hand at the moment. As a result, there is only Zuul.
Back up your fic, Dorothy, 'cos Kansas is going bye-bye.
("Actually, Minister..."
"Yes, Bernard?"
"...I don't know where to start.")
Re: Horribly mixed metaphors
Date: 2005-04-28 03:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 03:36 am (UTC)The site is now so big it must be a nightmare to police, but the current abuse report function seems to create more trouble than it solves.
Young teenagers are not who you want to have running a show like that.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 04:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 06:03 pm (UTC)There's a good website on copyright law at Stanford University's website.
And can you tell I worked in the copyright clearance office at my university for a while? You'd be amazed at how few rights you have with regard to copyright, even for educational use. And the laws have gotten even more restrictive since then.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 07:35 pm (UTC)they do have to pay. And BMI is incerdible strict and scary.
At the music venue I work at, we have to pay every time someone sings a song written by someone else, even if it's just one cover mixed in to a two hour show.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 01:20 pm (UTC)While quoting whole songs in one lump does my head in, that new ruling is just taking it to an extreme.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 01:26 pm (UTC)Full songs, that's fine since legal issues and such, but if they really think that they can police this completely, they're really on the crazy pills.
Makes me glad I avoid the place like the plague.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-01 10:39 am (UTC)But the increasing madness with the new and less and less clear rules can get to you, that's right. Now I can't know when all my stuff will get yanked... :((
no subject
Date: 2005-05-01 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 01:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 05:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 06:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 01:24 pm (UTC)And song lyrics may belong to the people who wrote them, but fanfiction is based on things that also belong to another party. Using their logic of shutting down anything that borders on illegal, ff.net should shut itself down.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 03:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 01:42 pm (UTC)I can see yanking it if there is more lyrics than story. Good-bye bad songfics. But otherwise, no.
*Hopes for the best*
Date: 2005-04-27 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 03:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 10:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 04:52 pm (UTC)Presumably this includes quotes from books, as well.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 06:38 pm (UTC)I really don't use lyrics in my fics. I parody songs, but that's about it. But still, sometimes there's a perfect line that leads into your fic perfectly. *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 09:26 pm (UTC)Gah. I've never written fanfics to post at FF.net to know, but that place doesn't sound like it's being too incredibly fun to use these days.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 12:15 am (UTC)Why no 'Tom Swift', though? I guess I'll have to write one...
no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 12:18 am (UTC)I've just about given up on FF.Net ever gaining some measure of sanity, anyway. I just go there to reach a larger audience (Really, there are lots of nice, reasonable, intelligent people there, underneath the seething fangirly horde).
no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 06:16 am (UTC)Not that I'm very nice or reasonable, but that is where the analogy breaks down.no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 06:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 02:22 am (UTC)RPF I could understand; the legalities are even more unsure on that point than on fanfic in general.
NC-17 I didn't care about one way or another as I don't read it.
Script format I was more upset about; although I don't care for chatroom-fic, this would affect everything in script format - including stuff like P@L's Leithian Script O.o
Interactive fic was pushing it; okay, so the "leave a review with your character" stuff was getting on my nerves, but choose-your-own-adventure is a genre, and second-person/you based? If that means all fics written in second person pov... they have got to be kidding.
Now this - on the one hand, the lyrics are copyrighted. On the other hand, this is fanfic - if we really want to make sure we don't violate copyright, we shouldn't be writing anything at all - and songfic has always been an accepted part of fanfic.
In short, this is getting more and more ridiculous. The way this is going, we'll soon only be able to post G-rated, 3-person-limited, stories to certain categories. Gah! >_<;;
The problem is, of course, that it is the biggest fanfiction archive out there and although we know of other, better ones, newbies tend to gravitate to FFN. I know I did.
...*kicks stupid site admins*
no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 03:45 am (UTC)If they ever get R fics off too, I think I shall leave. Gah.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 05:34 am (UTC)These "rules" that keep on coming up...it's like posting a signboard about 15 feet into the air with 14font writing on it stating all the kingdom's laws back in the ages when no commoner could read...and then punishing those who break the law.
If this 'plagerism' issue is so bad, why doesn't ff.net specify a little bit more directly as to WHAT rules a writer breaks when writing fanfiction. I really can't see how punishing a mountain over a molehill problem is going to help anything...we still do not know how much is acceptable and each time we think we are ok, our fingers get burnt off.
And for once...may a complaint over a story and/or it's content PLEASE be at least confirmed by a glance at the story itself? I could get Scribe kicked off ff.net entirely and she is one of the best writers on there...and this could be my simple minded self saying to the administration...
"This writer is using real life situations, I thought that was not allowed on ff.net. Also, I did not approve of her rating. The amount of violence in these fics should have it pushed up or taken off ff.net entirely and placed somewhere else. Yours sincerely, a 15 year old Sue." (and this letter would be merely hiding the fact said writer of the letter doesn't like elves getting hurt a lot)
The abuse of the system has gone on too long. Too many jump at the gun reactions to letters complaining about stories, and too many non-precise warnings as to how to NOT break the rules.
Am now wondering if using the Brunnen G marching song from 'Lex' as a small uplifter in two scenes from one story may be breaking rules now. I wouldn't know...it hasn't been specified.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 06:53 am (UTC)If ff.net actually bothered to properly look at complaints, a lot of grief could be spared, me thinks.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 11:17 am (UTC)It's a massive crossover, so I thought that I'd have to put it on ff.net, 'cause that's the only site --as far as I know-- that hosts multiple fandoms.
So, just curious about that.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-29 08:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-29 04:36 pm (UTC)This is fucked.