![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
misscamAnd in today's 'whaaaat?':
Females evolved pleasurable response to sex as a survival mechanism to deal with rape, much as males evolved the same to encourage it -- certainly long before humans ever arrived on the scene. In the animal kingdom, where consent is not a menaingful concept, all sex is rape and all sex is not-rape. To animals there is no difference between rape and consensual sex, because they are the same thing.(...)
Men evolved to compete with each other and then seize women as prizes, to force themselves on their prizes, and then develop a sense of emotional attachement to their prizes. Meanwhile women developed to enjoy being captured, and to take advantage of the emotional attachments that the male developed to enlist his aid in child-rearing.
It's pretty ugly yes, but it's there. And if you don't understand that men (all men) have that drive to varying degrees, to just take and let the consequences sort themselves out, then you'll never understand why men can get so angry at women that they will beat them to death for not consenting to sexual relations.
...
I'll take WHAT THE FUCK FELL ON YOUR HEAD? for 1000, Alex. Granted, when you wander out of the human neighbourhood and into the wide world of the animal kingdom, 'sex', 'consent' and 'pleasure' get new contexts to be wrapped in constantly and variations are many. Many, many, many. Which might be the first clue drawing sweeping conclusions and making generalizations could meet with fatal accidents. You know, trains of logic head-on.
Also - holy offensive bullcrappery, Batman! I'm not sure to be most offended over backdoor rape justification with villification of the female orgasm or the sweeping insult of males and their pet penises. Choices, choices.
For bonus points, watch him wank away in the wank report about him.
I think I shall exercise my female prerogative of not mating with the losers and throw this one out of the pool of even remote shag possibilities. With extreme prejudice. (However, any males who balk at the bullcrappery will increases their chances. I love me men of logic and sanity.)
In other news:
Norwegian oil fund now biggest fund in all of Europe
Nordic countries closest in the world to gender equality (Not bad, eh? Full report here.))
Settlements 'illegal according to Israeli law', says Israeli peace movement
Dutch election looks to be a close race
Females evolved pleasurable response to sex as a survival mechanism to deal with rape, much as males evolved the same to encourage it -- certainly long before humans ever arrived on the scene. In the animal kingdom, where consent is not a menaingful concept, all sex is rape and all sex is not-rape. To animals there is no difference between rape and consensual sex, because they are the same thing.(...)
Men evolved to compete with each other and then seize women as prizes, to force themselves on their prizes, and then develop a sense of emotional attachement to their prizes. Meanwhile women developed to enjoy being captured, and to take advantage of the emotional attachments that the male developed to enlist his aid in child-rearing.
It's pretty ugly yes, but it's there. And if you don't understand that men (all men) have that drive to varying degrees, to just take and let the consequences sort themselves out, then you'll never understand why men can get so angry at women that they will beat them to death for not consenting to sexual relations.
...
I'll take WHAT THE FUCK FELL ON YOUR HEAD? for 1000, Alex. Granted, when you wander out of the human neighbourhood and into the wide world of the animal kingdom, 'sex', 'consent' and 'pleasure' get new contexts to be wrapped in constantly and variations are many. Many, many, many. Which might be the first clue drawing sweeping conclusions and making generalizations could meet with fatal accidents. You know, trains of logic head-on.
Also - holy offensive bullcrappery, Batman! I'm not sure to be most offended over backdoor rape justification with villification of the female orgasm or the sweeping insult of males and their pet penises. Choices, choices.
For bonus points, watch him wank away in the wank report about him.
I think I shall exercise my female prerogative of not mating with the losers and throw this one out of the pool of even remote shag possibilities. With extreme prejudice. (However, any males who balk at the bullcrappery will increases their chances. I love me men of logic and sanity.)
In other news:
Norwegian oil fund now biggest fund in all of Europe
Nordic countries closest in the world to gender equality (Not bad, eh? Full report here.))
Settlements 'illegal according to Israeli law', says Israeli peace movement
Dutch election looks to be a close race
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 10:45 am (UTC)Even I didn't quite dare venture there. At least until you mentioned it. You bastard.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 10:50 am (UTC)Sorry about that. I need to... sit in a quiet corner. With a few stress toys and some porn
AND A BIG PUNCHING BAG IN THE SHAPE OF THIS GUY'S HEAD. Just until I calm down.no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 11:01 am (UTC)... Fuck, he's an atheist.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 11:10 am (UTC)*facepalm* I'm breathing, I swear.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 11:17 am (UTC)*gets own bag* Breathing is good. Yes.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 02:29 pm (UTC)On the other hand, pointing something like that out to a guy like him would be a waste of breath.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 07:26 pm (UTC)Care to borrow my Crowbar of Divine Justice?