Low insults and CSI high wank
Sep. 17th, 2006 05:40 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
misscamDamn
There seems to be shit going on there at several levels, including by some f_w members. However - rape as a cheat shot on people you don't like? Fucking *low*. Seriously. And I say this as someone who's had the extremely unfortuate displeasure of ending up in the statistics, with the chance of getting the guy rated at very low to none. Recognising it's a real, serious problem and a widespread crime? Good. Giving the victims of it the support and *respect* they need for getting through what is one of the most degrading things that can be done to another human being? Good. Realising no women ever ask to be raped and kicing any sort of argument of that in the arse? Very good. Giving real rapists all the contempt you can muster? Good. Using the fact that it's a widespread crime to insinuate anyone you don't like or any guy as 'having the mindset of it'? Shitty. Real shiity.
Arsehole doesn't equal rapist. In fact, from my admittedly limited experience of talking to others who've had it happen to them, the guy often doesn't behave like an asshole at all and you'd never think he was a rapist - up until he rapes. So, just because you don't like a guy or a group of guys don't mean they would rape someone. And similary, just because you like a guy doesn't mean he wouldn't. (Of course, I'm talking here of people you may not know too well yet. The better you know someone, the higher the chances of you knowing the inner workings. Even then, surprises do occur.)
So next time you're looking for an insult to really rile up someone, forgo that one, would you? It's low, it's cheap and you ain't crusading on behalf of those who have suffered it, let me tell you that.
Now, wasn't that cheerful?
In other cheerful news, Bush gets all testy
Bush said the Geneva Convention's ban was "very vague" and required clarification. "What does that mean, 'outrages upon human dignity?' That's a statement that is wide open to interpretation."
Read for yourself - article three is the one Bush is talking about. I don't find it very vague, but maybe that's just me.
Meanwhile, Sweden votes. Should be interesting to see of Sweden tosses out a leftish government just a year after Norway voted one in.
CSI wank is bloody everywhere
Now at the Jump the Shark website. Choice quotes:
Finale. Let me get this straight - for 6+ years the show runners have been beating us over the head with how ethical Grissom is and how he has told Sarah no on several occasions. Now we are supposed to believe that he has been banging her for a while now? How utterly professional of him! Couldn't they afford to hire an actress (or actor) who didn't actually work for him to play his lover? Maybe Medelsohn is trying to justify a possible skanky relationship of her own (with either her boss or someone who works for her) with this crap. I would rather they went back to making him deaf instead of being a hypocrite.
GRISSOM AND SARA DID NOT DO IT IN THE FINALE! But if we find out that they have done it, will do it, or actually did do it and they just didn't show us, then CSI has DEFINITELY jumped the shark! Nothing could be worse than having the two main characters, who have no chemistry WHATSOEVER, sleep together. Hats off to the dumbass writers who thought that one up.
To see Grissom and Sara together was horrifying. This resembled incest to me, Sara has deep issues about father figures, which is exactly what Grissom is to her. This show is doomed after so many great seasons if they continue with this storyline. Although I normally hate the dream motif, I truly hope this is just Sara's dream or Grissom's nightmare.
Final 60 seconds of the season 6 finale. When did it become acceptable for the boss to bang his employee? So help me if I see one more comment on how it is ok since they are in love my head might explode. Are the producers hoping that the viewers who do stay with the show next season will end up hating Petersen so much that they won't care when he gets killed off at the end of the season after his contract ends? Gee then those lucky few still watching can enjoy Jorja Fox doing her whole angst thing for season 8. I guess it is too much to hope that CBS will fire her again this summer, that way no one will be exposed to the Electra and Daddy show in September.
I have read that the scene was suppose to be more about two people being comfortable with each other than about sex. I truly did not see this. I asked my mother does she kneel at the bed when my father is talking. Let's just say the answer was no. I thought I should ask a couple that had been together less than my parents 40+ years. I asked three people who have been in a relationship ranging from 2 years to 17 years and the answer was the same. Two of them saw the show and while they ageed that it did not seem as if this was Gil and Sara's first time it also did not seem like they were a true couple. Shame on CSI for going that route.
hey were smart and abandoned the GSR story line in season one when the demographics said NO NO NO to the relationship, only to bow to the pressure of whiney teenboppers with no sense of what real relationships are. for the last 3 shows of the 6th season and includeing the finale, there is no way they are get out of the water. they have been stabbed, beaten, axed and shot. the sharks have already HIT the prey and stunned them. with william petersen leaving (well not being in the series MUCH next season) there is no hope for the show to continue. i think the writers will be surprised when the find the lack of viewers next year AFTER the first show. strange how the HIGHEST rated shows were LADY HEATHER and the LOWEST rated shows were SARA oreinted. that SHOULD have told the powers that be SOMETHING...guess they were blinded by the sun on the water.
I see the Guardian have a few says on it as well and a few on YTDAW are feeling a bit testy.
Brace for season seven, people.
Oh yeah, the wankshelter bar is open at all times these days. What's your posion?
There seems to be shit going on there at several levels, including by some f_w members. However - rape as a cheat shot on people you don't like? Fucking *low*. Seriously. And I say this as someone who's had the extremely unfortuate displeasure of ending up in the statistics, with the chance of getting the guy rated at very low to none. Recognising it's a real, serious problem and a widespread crime? Good. Giving the victims of it the support and *respect* they need for getting through what is one of the most degrading things that can be done to another human being? Good. Realising no women ever ask to be raped and kicing any sort of argument of that in the arse? Very good. Giving real rapists all the contempt you can muster? Good. Using the fact that it's a widespread crime to insinuate anyone you don't like or any guy as 'having the mindset of it'? Shitty. Real shiity.
Arsehole doesn't equal rapist. In fact, from my admittedly limited experience of talking to others who've had it happen to them, the guy often doesn't behave like an asshole at all and you'd never think he was a rapist - up until he rapes. So, just because you don't like a guy or a group of guys don't mean they would rape someone. And similary, just because you like a guy doesn't mean he wouldn't. (Of course, I'm talking here of people you may not know too well yet. The better you know someone, the higher the chances of you knowing the inner workings. Even then, surprises do occur.)
So next time you're looking for an insult to really rile up someone, forgo that one, would you? It's low, it's cheap and you ain't crusading on behalf of those who have suffered it, let me tell you that.
Now, wasn't that cheerful?
In other cheerful news, Bush gets all testy
Bush said the Geneva Convention's ban was "very vague" and required clarification. "What does that mean, 'outrages upon human dignity?' That's a statement that is wide open to interpretation."
Read for yourself - article three is the one Bush is talking about. I don't find it very vague, but maybe that's just me.
Meanwhile, Sweden votes. Should be interesting to see of Sweden tosses out a leftish government just a year after Norway voted one in.
CSI wank is bloody everywhere
Now at the Jump the Shark website. Choice quotes:
Finale. Let me get this straight - for 6+ years the show runners have been beating us over the head with how ethical Grissom is and how he has told Sarah no on several occasions. Now we are supposed to believe that he has been banging her for a while now? How utterly professional of him! Couldn't they afford to hire an actress (or actor) who didn't actually work for him to play his lover? Maybe Medelsohn is trying to justify a possible skanky relationship of her own (with either her boss or someone who works for her) with this crap. I would rather they went back to making him deaf instead of being a hypocrite.
GRISSOM AND SARA DID NOT DO IT IN THE FINALE! But if we find out that they have done it, will do it, or actually did do it and they just didn't show us, then CSI has DEFINITELY jumped the shark! Nothing could be worse than having the two main characters, who have no chemistry WHATSOEVER, sleep together. Hats off to the dumbass writers who thought that one up.
To see Grissom and Sara together was horrifying. This resembled incest to me, Sara has deep issues about father figures, which is exactly what Grissom is to her. This show is doomed after so many great seasons if they continue with this storyline. Although I normally hate the dream motif, I truly hope this is just Sara's dream or Grissom's nightmare.
Final 60 seconds of the season 6 finale. When did it become acceptable for the boss to bang his employee? So help me if I see one more comment on how it is ok since they are in love my head might explode. Are the producers hoping that the viewers who do stay with the show next season will end up hating Petersen so much that they won't care when he gets killed off at the end of the season after his contract ends? Gee then those lucky few still watching can enjoy Jorja Fox doing her whole angst thing for season 8. I guess it is too much to hope that CBS will fire her again this summer, that way no one will be exposed to the Electra and Daddy show in September.
I have read that the scene was suppose to be more about two people being comfortable with each other than about sex. I truly did not see this. I asked my mother does she kneel at the bed when my father is talking. Let's just say the answer was no. I thought I should ask a couple that had been together less than my parents 40+ years. I asked three people who have been in a relationship ranging from 2 years to 17 years and the answer was the same. Two of them saw the show and while they ageed that it did not seem as if this was Gil and Sara's first time it also did not seem like they were a true couple. Shame on CSI for going that route.
hey were smart and abandoned the GSR story line in season one when the demographics said NO NO NO to the relationship, only to bow to the pressure of whiney teenboppers with no sense of what real relationships are. for the last 3 shows of the 6th season and includeing the finale, there is no way they are get out of the water. they have been stabbed, beaten, axed and shot. the sharks have already HIT the prey and stunned them. with william petersen leaving (well not being in the series MUCH next season) there is no hope for the show to continue. i think the writers will be surprised when the find the lack of viewers next year AFTER the first show. strange how the HIGHEST rated shows were LADY HEATHER and the LOWEST rated shows were SARA oreinted. that SHOULD have told the powers that be SOMETHING...guess they were blinded by the sun on the water.
I see the Guardian have a few says on it as well and a few on YTDAW are feeling a bit testy.
Brace for season seven, people.
Oh yeah, the wankshelter bar is open at all times these days. What's your posion?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 06:29 pm (UTC)Can you tell this to fanfic writers? Too often a writer will use rape as a plot device to get their OTP hooked up. If a character is a bit of a bastard, the fanturds seem to assume he'd automatically rape someone just because he has an attitude problem. The next time I see a fic where character A rapes character B and character B runs into the arms of character C and B&C have magical healing sex and become twu wuvers, I'll scream. I don't think this has happened in the Doctor Who fandom ficworld yet, although it wouldn't shock me if it has or when it does.